Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure in Canada

Canada
81
15.3 % of health expenditure
Score / 100
#79
of 229 countries

Canada out-of-pocket health expenditure: low core fees, but relevant private costs

Canada receives 81 out of 100 points for out-of-pocket health expenditure. The rating is solid because medically necessary hospital and physician services are publicly insured for eligible residents. However, outpatient prescription drugs, dental care, vision care, long-term care and allied therapies can still create private costs.

The measured value is 15.3 % of health expenditure. It is the share of direct household payments in current health expenditure. For this indicator, lower is better because lower direct payment usually means less financial risk for patients.

Concrete data on direct payments

The World Bank/WHO series on direct household payments shows Canada at 15.3% of current health expenditure in the latest value used here. That is far below countries with very high out-of-pocket funding, but it is not zero. The Commonwealth Fund identifies dental care, prescription drugs and long-term care as major areas where private payment still matters.

  • Out-of-pocket share: 15.3% of current health expenditure paid directly by households.
  • Public financing: CIHI expects the public sector to account for 71% of total health expenditure in 2025.
  • Total spending: CIHI forecasts about $284 billion in 2025 (CAD 399 billion).
  • Spending per person: about $6,860 per Canadian in 2025 (CAD 9,626).
  • Financial coverage: the OECD reports 70% of spending covered by mandatory prepayment, below the OECD average of 75%.

These numbers explain the middle-to-good position. Canada protects the core of care strongly, but the private edge is large enough that households need to plan. Anyone who regularly needs medication, dental work, glasses, physiotherapy or psychological care should look beyond the public provincial plan.

What is publicly covered

The Canada Health Act requires reasonable access to medically necessary services for eligible residents without patient charges. It covers medically necessary hospital services, physician services and certain surgical-dental services in hospital. Provinces and territories implement those standards through their own insurance plans.

This is a major practical advantage: an insured resident normally does not pay direct charges for necessary hospital and physician care at the point of service. Still, provinces and territories decide which services are insured. That is where differences and out-of-pocket exposure begin.

Where out-of-pocket costs arise

Common private costs sit outside the core package. They can include non-insured medicines, dental visits, vision care, private or semi-private extras, non-medically necessary certificates, cosmetic procedures, devices, allied therapies and parts of long-term care. Employer benefits or private insurance can reduce these gaps, but not everyone has them.

For newcomers, the province is decisive. Some provinces have waiting periods, income tests, age rules or their own drug and supplementary benefit programs. Anyone entering without active provincial coverage needs transitional insurance. Families, people with chronic illness and people with regular prescriptions should check expected out-of-pocket exposure before choosing where to live.

What this indicator does not measure

The indicator measures financial exposure, not waiting times, hospital quality, physician density or the chance of quickly finding a family doctor. Canada can perform well on direct patient charges while still being harder on appointment availability or regional access.

It also does not measure the burden on a specific household. A national share of 15.3% may be barely visible for a healthy person, but significant for a family facing dental work, specialty drugs or long-term care. The value is a useful system indicator, not an individual cost forecast.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do patients pay directly for doctors and hospitals in Canada?

Eligible residents generally do not pay direct patient charges for medically necessary hospital and physician services. Visitors and people without active provincial coverage are different.

Why are there still out-of-pocket costs?

The public core does not cover every service. Prescription drugs outside hospital, dental care, vision care and long-term care can create private payments.

Is private supplementary insurance important?

For many workers, yes. Employer plans can close gaps for drugs, dental care or therapies. Self-employed people, students and new arrivals should check those gaps separately.

Is a lower value better?

Yes. For this indicator, a lower share of direct household payment means less financial burden from healthcare.

Related indicators

Sources

This article was created on July 17, 2026

Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure — Global Ranking ↗

# Country Value Score
1 Tuvalu 0.0 % of health expenditure 100
2 Nauru 0.7 % of health expenditure 99
2 Marshall Islands 1.1 % of health expenditure 99
4 Micronesia 2.6 % of health expenditure 97
5 Kiribati 2.9 % of health expenditure 96
67 Colombia 14.7 % of health expenditure 82
79 Iceland 14.9 % of health expenditure 81
79 Canada 15.3 % of health expenditure 81
81 Australia 15.8 % of health expenditure 80
81 Poland 16.2 % of health expenditure 80
227 Turkmenistan 77.4 % of health expenditure 3
228 Bangladesh 79.3 % of health expenditure 1
229 Armenia 80.5 % of health expenditure 0
← Back to Canada