Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure in United States

United States
86
10.9 % of health expenditure
Score / 100
#41
of 229 countries

US health costs: low system share, high personal risk

The United States receives a strong rating of 86 out of 100 points for out-of-pocket health expenditure. The measured value is 10.9 % of health expenditure of current health expenditure, showing the share paid directly by households rather than through insurers, government programmes or other payers.

This should not be read as cheap healthcare. The United States can look good on this narrow share while treatment prices, premiums, deductibles and billing risk remain very high for individuals. For foreigners, insurance status is therefore central.

What the measured value describes

The measured value comes from international health data and describes direct household payments as a share of total current health spending. Lower values are better because fewer costs are paid immediately out of pocket.

In the United States, the figure is shaped by private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid and employer-sponsored plans. Many expenses flow through insurers or public programmes. Insured people can still pay large amounts through deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, uncovered services or out-of-network treatment.

Access for foreigners and residents

The practical situation depends heavily on status. Employees with strong employer coverage, students with university insurance and permanent residents with access to regular insurance routes face a different reality from visitors, new arrivals without coverage or self-employed people without a stable plan.

HealthCare.gov and state marketplaces can matter depending on immigration status. Medicaid rules and insurance markets also vary by state. Anyone moving to the United States should therefore check their actual status and state rather than relying only on the national figure.

Costs, insurance and evidence

The key question is not only whether insurance exists, but what it covers. Network doctors, emergency rooms, medicines, specialists, pregnancy, pre-existing conditions, mental health, dental care and international prior insurance can be treated very differently.

Even good insurance can leave deductibles, copayments and coinsurance. Without insurance, a single hospital case can become financially dangerous. For travellers and new residents, a robust policy is not a formality; it is part of basic financial planning.

People with chronic conditions, regular medication, children or family planning should be especially careful. They need a plan that gives real access to the care they use, not merely proof of coverage.

New arrivals should also watch timing. A gap between arrival, job start, open enrollment, student coverage or marketplace eligibility can leave a person exposed. Short-term travel insurance, visitor medical cover and domestic health insurance are not interchangeable products, so the transition period needs its own plan.

For families, the weakest link can be a dependant rather than the main earner. Children, spouses and older relatives may need different provider networks or medicine coverage, so household risk should be checked person by person.

Regional differences and practical care

The United States has world-class medical centres, but regional differences are large. Metropolitan areas often offer specialist access, while rural areas can involve longer distances, fewer providers and narrower networks. Insurance can also be tied to state, employer and provider lists.

For migrants, location, employer, insurance network and personal health needs should be assessed together. A cheaper city can become expensive if the right doctor is outside the network or a key medicine is not covered.

What this indicator does not measure

This indicator does not measure absolute US healthcare prices, hospital quality or whether a specific person can obtain insurance. It only measures the direct-payment share of total health expenditure.

The practical conclusion is that the United States performs well on this narrow metric, but individual cost risk still depends on insurance, status, state and contract details.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the strong rating mean healthcare is cheap in the United States?

No. It describes the direct-payment share in the whole system. Absolute prices and personal cost-sharing can still be high.

Do visitors need health insurance?

Yes, in practice. Without appropriate coverage, emergencies and hospital stays can be extremely expensive.

Do all immigrants have access to public programmes?

No. Access depends on status, state, time in the country, income and programme rules.

What should be checked before moving?

Immigration status, employer coverage, marketplace eligibility, state rules, provider network, deductibles, medicines and emergency care.

Related indicators

Sources

This article was created on June 26, 2026

Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure — Global Ranking ↗

# Country Value Score
1 Tuvalu 0.0 % of health expenditure 100
2 Nauru 0.7 % of health expenditure 99
2 Marshall Islands 1.1 % of health expenditure 99
4 Micronesia 2.6 % of health expenditure 97
5 Kiribati 2.9 % of health expenditure 96
35 Zimbabwe 10.6 % of health expenditure 87
35 Germany 10.7 % of health expenditure 87
41 United States 10.9 % of health expenditure 86
41 American Samoa 10.9 % of health expenditure 86
41 Northern Mariana Islands 10.9 % of health expenditure 86
227 Turkmenistan 77.4 % of health expenditure 3
228 Bangladesh 79.3 % of health expenditure 1
229 Armenia 80.5 % of health expenditure 0
← Back to United States